RESEARCH

The Social Dimensions of Therapeutic Horticulture

The research found benefits in therapeutic horticulture programs linked to participants’ motivations, though pinpointing precise causes was challenging. The study concludes that while these programs are beneficial, their effectiveness is influenced by many overlapping factors.

Program Types: Social

Population Groups: Mental Health Challenges/Trauma

Setting or Context: Community Gardens

Allied Profession Intersections: Occupational Therapy, Landscape Design

Type of Activity: Outdoor Gardening, Forest/Natural Area Immersion

Evidence Type: Qualitative Research, Anecdotal Evidence/Testimonials

Measurement and Evaluation: Patient-Reported Outcomes

Access: Free

Print Form

Summary

This research paper explores the effects of therapeutic horticulture (TH) programs. It highlights that significant features were associated with the outcomes of these programs, revealing difficulties in establishing clear connections between the interventions and their effectiveness. The study employed Nvivo software to manage and analyze data, focusing on benefits, engagement factors, and gardening interest. Researchers coded the data in three stages and identified perceived benefits linked to motivations for participating in the project. Participants’ consent was obtained, and the sessions were audio-taped for accuracy in data analysis.

The paper emphasizes that despite the perceived benefits, it is challenging to pinpoint specific causes for the results due to the complex nature of the programs and participants’ diverse motivations. The ethical approval was granted by Canterbury Christ Church University, ensuring that participants were informed and consented to the study. The findings suggest that participation in TH programs is beneficial, but no single barrier or reason can fully explain the outcomes.